Throughout the project, we’ll post questions and comments that have been submitted on comment cards collected at community meetings, sent via email or submitted via the website.

17 results found
Comments per page 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 View All Export to CSV
Next 10 →

Showing 0-10 comments of 17

Kub Comment On Recode Knoxville Draft 3 Proposed Zoning Map

Per my voice message, we believe the property (Parcel ID 095KA01002) that we own at 2106 Mohawk Avenue should be shown as I-H instead of MPC’s proposed I-MU. This zoning would then match our adjacent MBW Water Plant current property zoning. Thank you.
Staff Reply:

Recode Comments

Sky Ranch Airport (3539 Alcoa Highway) retains its AG zoning (currently AG-1). It needs to change to something that allows airports (currently only I-H).
Staff Reply:

Recode Comments

Here are a few more notes on the last version of the zoning map.Rule High (1901 Vermont) is proposed as RN-2, currently R-2. The Sector Plan says CI. It has not been an operating school since 1991 but is still owned by the County. I would suggest a zone that would allow redevelopment with mixed use or denser residential, maybe RN-3 or RN-4. I suspect that the school would not be salvageable, but townhouses would be cool.There is an oddball industrial area of about 35 acres at 117 and 119 Stone Road that was once a marble quarry. It seems unlikely that it would find a new industrial use. The Sector Plan says LDR. Part of it is currently a car repair shop or something similar with a residence; the rest is idle. I would suggest a zone that is more compatible with the low-density residential of the adjacent area, and it seems like a good opportunity for a housing development. I have no idea what the property owners would think of this idea.1601 Beaumont is a grocery store in RN-2 (currently R1-A). Looks like it should be neighborhood commercial (C-N).
Staff Reply:

424 And 428 E Scott Ave

RN-5 is the appropriate zoning for this property given existing surrounding land use and conditions within proximity.
Staff Reply:

400 E Scott

RN-5 is the appropriate zoning for this property given existing use and conditions in immediate proximity.
Staff Reply:

319 E Scott

RN-4 is the appropriate zoning for this given existing conditions of this property and proximity to other multi-family along E Scott.
Staff Reply:

401 E Scott

RN-4 is the appropriate zoning for this given existing use conditions of this property and proximity to other multi-family along E Scott.
Staff Reply:

I am against the rezoning proposal because it dramatically increase the traffic on cedar lane and further overcrowding of sterchi elementary. It would also reduce the property values of single family homes in the area.
Staff Reply:

2222 Riverside Drive

The properties 2214-2226 Riverside and 0 Mohawk, 2217 Mohawk, and 2315 Birdsong would be appropriate for an infill pocket neighborhood as described in RN-4 guidelines.
Staff Reply:

2214 Riverside

The properties 2214-2226 Riverside and 0 Mohawk, 2217 Mohawk, and 2315 Birdsong would be appropriate for an infill pocket neighborhood as described in RN-4 guidelines.
Staff Reply:

17 results found
Comments per page 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 View All Export to CSV